Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Marlon Bramwell v. R. Perdue, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    1) Marlon Bramwell, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his motion to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59(e). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's orders. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-05-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6182

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Marlon Bramwell, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his motion to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59(e). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's orders. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Marlon Bramwell v. R. Perdue, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Marlon Bramwell, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his motion to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59(e). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's orders. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6182

    MARLON BRAMWELL,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    R. A. PERDUE,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
    Frederick P. Stamp,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:14-cv-00007-FPS-RWT)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2015

    Decided:

    May 27, 2015

    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Marlon Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se.


    Erin K. Reisenweber,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Marlon Bramwell, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
    judge

    and

    petition,

    denying
    and

    relief

    denying

    his

    on

    motion

    under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e).


    find no reversible error.
    courts
    facts

    orders.

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We

    his

    28

    to

    U.S.C.

    alter

    or

    2241
    amend

    (2012)
    judgment

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm the district

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    because

    presented

    would

    not

    the

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like