Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mark Hammond v. R. Perdue, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Mark Hammond, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his Rule 59(e) motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed both decisions, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its January 8, 2015 and February 9, 2015 orders. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-05-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6292

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mark Hammond, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his Rule 59(e) motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed both decisions, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its January 8, 2015 and February 9, 2015 orders. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Mark Hammond v. R. Perdue, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mark Hammond, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denial of his Rule 59(e) motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed both decisions, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its January 8, 2015 and February 9, 2015 orders. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6292

    MARK HAMMOND,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    R. A. PERDUE,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
    Irene M. Keeley,
    District Judge. (1:14-cv-00047-IMK-JSK)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2015

    Decided:

    May 27, 2015

    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mark Hammond, Appellant Pro Se.


    Helen Campbell Altmeyer,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark
    courts
    judge

    Hammond,

    order
    and

    petition.

    federal

    accepting

    denying

    the

    relief

    prisoner,

    appeals

    recommendation
    on

    his

    28

    of

    U.S.C.

    the
    the

    district

    magistrate

    2241

    (2012)

    He also appeals the courts order denying his Fed. R.

    Civ. P. 59(e) motion.


    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    Hammond v. Perdue, No. 1:14-cv-00047-

    IMK-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 8, 2015; Feb. 9, 2015).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like