Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Charles Gary v. Lawrence Wang, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Charles Edward Gary appealed a magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Lawrence Wang. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the magistrate judge's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in that decision. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-06-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6539

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Edward Gary appealed a magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Lawrence Wang. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the magistrate judge's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in that decision. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Charles Gary v. Lawrence Wang, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Edward Gary appealed a magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. Lawrence Wang. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the magistrate judge's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in that decision. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6539

    CHARLES EDWARD GARY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DR. LAWRENCE WANG,
    Defendant Appellee,
    and
    SHERIFF MIKE MONDUL; DANVILLE
    SAUNDERS; DANVILLE CITY,

    CITY

    JAIL;

    MAYOR

    SHERMAN

    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Robert Stewart Ballou,
    Magistrate Judge. (7:14-cv-00103-RSB)

    Submitted:

    June 18, 2015

    Decided:

    June 23, 2015

    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles Edward Gary, Appellant Pro Se.


    Gary Christopher Jones, Jr., SINNOTT,
    Midlothian, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Kenneth Francis Hardt,


    NUCKOLS & LOGAN, PC,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Edward Gary appeals the magistrate judges order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.


    Wang, No. 7:14-cv-00103-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2015).

    Gary v.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like