Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 23 views

    Jean Dalle Essoka v. Loretta Lynch, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Jean Roger Dalle Essoka's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision. The Board had denied Dalle Essoka's motion to reopen his immigration case as untimely. The Court reviewed the record and found that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, as it was filed after the regulatory deadline. As a result, the Court denied the petition for the same reasons provided by the Board in its earlier decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Jean Dalle Essoka v. Loretta Lynch, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    23 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Jean Roger Dalle Essoka's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision. The Board had denied Dalle Essoka's motion to reopen his immigration case as untimely. The Court reviewed the record and found that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, as it was filed after the regulatory deadline. As a result, the Court denied the petition for the same reasons provided by the Board in its earlier decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-06-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-2221

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Jean Roger Dalle Essoka's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision. The Board had denied Dalle Essoka's motion to reopen his immigration case as untimely. The Court reviewed the record and found that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, as it was filed after the regulatory deadline. As a result, the Court denied the petition for the same reasons provided by the Board in its earlier decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    23 views2 pages

    Jean Dalle Essoka v. Loretta Lynch, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Jean Roger Dalle Essoka's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision. The Board had denied Dalle Essoka's motion to reopen his immigration case as untimely. The Court reviewed the record and found that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, as it was filed after the regulatory deadline. As a result, the Court denied the petition for the same reasons provided by the Board in its earlier decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-2221

    JEAN ROGER DALLE ESSOKA,


    Petitioner,
    v.
    LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
    Respondent.

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration


    Appeals.

    Submitted:

    June 18, 2015

    Decided:

    June 26, 2015

    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Danielle
    Beach-Oswald,
    Terese
    Tadros
    Ibarra,
    BEACH-OSWALD
    IMMIGRATION
    LAW
    ASSOCIATES,
    PC,
    Washington,
    D.C.,
    for
    Petitioner.
    Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant
    Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Assistant Director, Joseph
    A. OConnell, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jean Roger Dalle Essoka, a native and citizen of Cameroon,
    petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals

    (Board)

    denying

    his

    motion

    to

    reopen.

    We

    have

    reviewed the record and the Boards order and find that the
    Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as
    untimely.

    See 8 C.F.R. 1003.2(a), (c) (2014).

    Accordingly,

    we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
    Board.
    dispense

    See In re: Dalle Essoka (B.I.A. Oct. 8, 2014).


    with

    contentions

    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    We

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like