Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Nathaniel Hart v. Bobby Shearin, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Nathaniel Hart in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Bobby Shearin. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its February 23, 2015 order denying relief to Hart. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Nathaniel Hart v. Bobby Shearin, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Nathaniel Hart in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Bobby Shearin. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its February 23, 2015 order denying relief to Hart. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-06-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6442

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Nathaniel Hart in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Bobby Shearin. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its February 23, 2015 order denying relief to Hart. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Nathaniel Hart v. Bobby Shearin, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Nathaniel Hart in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Bobby Shearin. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its February 23, 2015 order denying relief to Hart. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6442

    NATHANIEL LEKAI HART,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    BOBBY P. SHEARIN,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
    (1:14-cv-00727-GLR)

    Submitted:

    June 25, 2015

    Decided:

    June 30, 2015

    Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Nathaniel Lekai Hart, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith LaneWeber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Nathaniel

    Lekai

    Hart

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    order

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Hart v.

    Shearin, No. 1:14-cv-00727-GLR (D. Md. Feb. 23, 2015). We dispense


    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like