Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Ekere Inyangette v. Travis Bragg, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Ekere Inyangette, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. 2) The district court had referred the case to a magistrate judge, who recommended denying relief. Inyangette failed to file specific objections to the magistrate's recommendation. 3) Because Inyangette did not file specific objections after being warned that this was necessary to preserve appellate review, the Fourth Circuit found that he had waived appellate review and affirmed the district court's judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Ekere Inyangette v. Travis Bragg, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    1) Ekere Inyangette, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. 2) The district court had referred the case to a magistrate judge, who recommended denying relief. Inyangette failed to file specific objections to the magistrate's recommendation. 3) Because Inyangette did not file specific objections after being warned that this was necessary to preserve appellate review, the Fourth Circuit found that he had waived appellate review and affirmed the district court's judgment.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-07-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6518

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Ekere Inyangette, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. 2) The district court had referred the case to a magistrate judge, who recommended denying relief. Inyangette failed to file specific objections to the magistrate's recommendation. 3) Because Inyangette did not file specific objections after being warned that this was necessary to preserve appellate review, the Fourth Circuit found that he had waived appellate review and affirmed the district court's judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Ekere Inyangette v. Travis Bragg, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Ekere Inyangette, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. 2) The district court had referred the case to a magistrate judge, who recommended denying relief. Inyangette failed to file specific objections to the magistrate's recommendation. 3) Because Inyangette did not file specific objections after being warned that this was necessary to preserve appellate review, the Fourth Circuit found that he had waived appellate review and affirmed the district court's judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6518

    EKERE INYANGETTE,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    TRAVIS BRAGG, Warden FCI Bennettsville,
    Respondent Appellee,
    and
    DARLENE DREW,
    Respondent.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge.
    (6:13-cv-01219-BHH)

    Submitted:

    July 21, 2015

    Decided:

    July 24, 2015

    Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ekere Inyangette, Appellant Pro Se.


    Barbara Murcier Bowens,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ekere Inyangette, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
    and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2012) petition.

    The

    district court referred this case to the magistrate judge pursuant


    to

    28

    U.S.C.

    636(b)(1)(B)

    (2012).

    The

    magistrate

    judge

    recommended that relief be denied and advised Inyangette that


    failure to file specific objections to this recommendation would
    waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
    recommendation.
    The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
    judges recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
    of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been
    warned of the consequences of noncompliance.

    Wright v. Collins,

    766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474
    U.S. 140 (1985). Inyangette has waived appellate review by failing
    to

    file

    specific

    objections

    after

    receiving

    proper

    notice.

    Accordingly, although we grant Inyangettes motion to proceed in


    forma pauperis, we affirm the district courts judgment.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED
    2

    You might also like