Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Casey Tyler v. Oliver Washington, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Casey Rafael Tyler appealed the district court's denial of his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as moot. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision. Unpublished opinions from the Fourth Circuit are not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-07-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6642

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Casey Rafael Tyler appealed the district court's denial of his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as moot. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision. Unpublished opinions from the Fourth Circuit are not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Casey Tyler v. Oliver Washington, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Casey Rafael Tyler appealed the district court's denial of his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as moot. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision. Unpublished opinions from the Fourth Circuit are not binding precedent. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6642

    CASEY RAFAEL TYLER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    OLIVER WASHINGTON,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
    District Judge. (5:14-ct-03126-H)

    Submitted:

    July 21, 2015

    Decided:

    July 24, 2015

    Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Casey Rafael Tyler, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Casey Rafael Tyler appeals the district courts order denying
    as moot his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Tyler v. Washington, No. 5:14-ct-03126-H (E.D.N.C. Apr.

    21, 2015).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like