Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Alexander Matthews v. Michael Pauze, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Alexander Otis Matthews' complaint alleging prosecutorial misconduct. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision. The dismissal was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Alexander Matthews v. Michael Pauze, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Alexander Otis Matthews' complaint alleging prosecutorial misconduct. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision. The dismissal was affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-07-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6372

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Alexander Otis Matthews' complaint alleging prosecutorial misconduct. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision. The dismissal was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Alexander Matthews v. Michael Pauze, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Alexander Otis Matthews' complaint alleging prosecutorial misconduct. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision. The dismissal was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6372

    ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    MICHAEL RICHARD PAUZE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam OGrady, District Judge.
    (1:14-cv-00248-LO-TRJ)

    Submitted:

    July 23, 2015

    Decided:

    July 27, 2015

    Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Alexander Otis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Alexander Otis Matthews appeals the district courts order
    granting

    his

    motion

    to

    correct

    misfiling

    complaint alleging prosecutorial misconduct.


    record and find no reversible error.

    and

    dismissing

    his

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Matthews v. Pauze, No.

    1:14-cv-00248-LO-TRJ (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2015).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like