Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 49 views

    Julian Harman v. Commissioner Social Security, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in a case where Julian Harman appealed the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court that the denial of benefits should be upheld. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in written submissions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Julian Harman v. Commissioner Social Security, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    49 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in a case where Julian Harman appealed the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court that the denial of benefits should be upheld. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in written submissions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-08-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-2287

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in a case where Julian Harman appealed the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court that the denial of benefits should be upheld. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in written submissions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    49 views2 pages

    Julian Harman v. Commissioner Social Security, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in a case where Julian Harman appealed the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court that the denial of benefits should be upheld. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in written submissions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-2287

    JULIAN HARMAN,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
    (6:13-cv-01728-TMC)

    Submitted:

    July 30, 2015

    Before KING and


    Circuit Judge.

    FLOYD,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    August 13, 2015

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    W. Daniel Mayes, SMITH, MASSEY, BRODIE, GUYNN, & MAYES, P.A.,


    Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellant. Hugh Dun Rappaport,
    Special Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts;
    Marshall Prince, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia,
    South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Julian Harman appeals the district courts order adopting
    the recommendation of the magistrate judge and entering judgment
    for the Commissioner in this action challenging the denial of
    disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Harman v. Commr Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 6:13-cv-01728-TMC

    (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2014).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like