Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ross Fiorani, Jr. v. Navy Federal Credit Union, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views3 pages
    Ross Fiorani appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil complaint against Navy Federal Credit Union, a Fairfax County police officer, and others. An unpublished opinion by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. While allowing Fiorani to proceed without paying fees, the appeals court upheld the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its earlier ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-08-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1387

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ross Fiorani appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil complaint against Navy Federal Credit Union, a Fairfax County police officer, and others. An unpublished opinion by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. While allowing Fiorani to proceed without paying fees, the appeals court upheld the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its earlier ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views3 pages

    Ross Fiorani, Jr. v. Navy Federal Credit Union, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ross Fiorani appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil complaint against Navy Federal Credit Union, a Fairfax County police officer, and others. An unpublished opinion by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. While allowing Fiorani to proceed without paying fees, the appeals court upheld the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its earlier ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1387

    ROSS A. FIORANI, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE, LawEnforcement Agency; FEIGLESON, A Fairfax County Police
    Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    ROBERT BERGER, Senior Vice-President of Navy Federal; KAREN
    COMPHER, Senior manager at Navy Federal; JOHN STEINER,
    Manager of Navy Federal; KIM LILLY, Manager at Navy Federal;
    SIA, A Company; THEMA SCOTT, Tow-Truck Driver,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Liam OGrady, District
    Judge. (1:15-cv-00291-LO-TCB)

    Submitted:

    August 20, 2015

    Decided:

    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    August 24, 2015

    Ross A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Bierbower, HUNTON


    & WILLIAMS, LLP, Washington, DC; Thomas R. Waskom, HUNTON &
    WILLIAMS,
    LLP,
    Richmond,
    Virginia;
    Ann
    Gouldin
    Killalea,
    Assistant County Attorney, David P. Bobzien, FAIRFAX COUNTY
    ATTORNEYS OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ross A. Fiorani, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his civil complaint.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, although we grant leave

    to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated


    by the district court.

    Fiorani v. Navy Fed. Credit Union, No.

    1:15-cv-00291-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2015).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like