Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Christopher Ramsay v. Roberta Garcia-Guajardo, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    25 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Roberta L. Garcia-Guajardo and Steven Guajardo. The Guajardos had filed motions in district court under Rules 60(b)(3), (4), and (d)(3) to set aside a judgment against them, which the district court denied. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied the Guajardos' request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed their appeal for the reasons provided by the district court in its earlier order denying their post-judgment motions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-08-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1511

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Roberta L. Garcia-Guajardo and Steven Guajardo. The Guajardos had filed motions in district court under Rules 60(b)(3), (4), and (d)(3) to set aside a judgment against them, which the district court denied. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied the Guajardos' request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed their appeal for the reasons provided by the district court in its earlier order denying their post-judgment motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    25 views2 pages

    Christopher Ramsay v. Roberta Garcia-Guajardo, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Roberta L. Garcia-Guajardo and Steven Guajardo. The Guajardos had filed motions in district court under Rules 60(b)(3), (4), and (d)(3) to set aside a judgment against them, which the district court denied. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied the Guajardos' request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed their appeal for the reasons provided by the district court in its earlier order denying their post-judgment motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1511

    CHRISTOPHER RAMSAY,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ROBERTA L. GARCIA-GUAJARDO; STEVEN GUAJARDO,
    Defendants - Appellants,
    and
    SANIBEL & LANCASTER INSURANCE, LLC; GARY J. HUNTER,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (2:11-cv-00207-MSD-LRL)

    Submitted:

    August 20, 2015

    Decided:

    August 24, 2015

    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Roberta L. Garcia-Guajardo; Steven Guajardo, Appellants Pro Se.


    James R. Theuer, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Roberta L. Garcia-Guajardo and Steven Guajardo appeal the
    district courts order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3),
    (4), and (d)(3) motions to set aside the judgment against them.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    Accordingly,

    we

    the

    deny

    record
    leave

    and

    to

    find

    proceed

    no
    in

    reversible
    forma

    error.

    pauperis

    and

    dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
    Ramsey v. Garcia-Guajardo, No. 2:11-cv-00207-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va.
    May 5, 2015).
    appeal.
    legal
    before

    We deny Appellants motion for a stay pending

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like