Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tori Neal v. Anna Sterling, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Tori Neal's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against police officers and departments. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim. Neal appealed the dismissal and the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The appellate court found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's rulings, denying Neal's motion for appointment of counsel without oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-08-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6418

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Tori Neal's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against police officers and departments. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim. Neal appealed the dismissal and the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The appellate court found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's rulings, denying Neal's motion for appointment of counsel without oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    Tori Neal v. Anna Sterling, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Tori Neal's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against police officers and departments. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim. Neal appealed the dismissal and the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The appellate court found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's rulings, denying Neal's motion for appointment of counsel without oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6418

    TORI NEAL, a/k/a Tory Nelson,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    POLICE
    OFFICER
    ANNA
    STERLING;
    DEPARTMENT; IBRIHIM WAHEED,

    DURHAM

    COUNTY

    POLICE

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
    William L. Osteen,
    Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:13-cv-00904-WO-LPA)

    Submitted:

    August 27, 2015

    Decided:

    August 31, 2015

    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Tori Neal, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Tori Neal appeals the district courts order accepting the
    recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) (2012)
    and the order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter
    or amend the judgment.
    reversible

    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly,

    we

    deny

    Neals

    motion

    for

    appointment of counsel and affirm the district courts orders.


    Neal

    v.

    Sterling,

    No.

    2014 & Feb. 4, 2015).

    1:13-cv-00904-WO-LPA

    (M.D.N.C.

    May

    20,

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like