Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Ethan Moore v. Joel Ziegler, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ethan Moore, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Moore's petition for the reasons stated in its opinion. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Ethan Moore v. Joel Ziegler, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Ethan Moore, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Moore's petition for the reasons stated in its opinion. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-11-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6871

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ethan Moore, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Moore's petition for the reasons stated in its opinion. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Ethan Moore v. Joel Ziegler, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ethan Moore, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny Moore's petition for the reasons stated in its opinion. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials, the Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6871

    ETHAN JEROME MOORE,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    JOEL ZIEGLER,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
    Irene C. Berger,
    District Judge. (5:11-cv-00521)

    Submitted:

    November 21, 2013

    Decided:

    November 25, 2013

    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ethan Jerome Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ethan Jerome Moore, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district

    courts

    order

    accepting

    the

    recommendation

    of

    the

    magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241


    (West 2006 & Supp. 2013) petition.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.


    5:11-cv-00521 (S.D.W. Va. May 29, 2013).

    Moore v. Ziegler, No.


    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like