Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jackie Robinson v. Commissioner of IRS, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 2015. It affirms the tax court's decision to uphold the IRS's assessment of tax deficiencies and penalties against Jackie and Lolita Robinson for tax years 2007 and 2008. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the tax court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the tax court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's January 8, 2015 decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-09-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1380

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 2015. It affirms the tax court's decision to uphold the IRS's assessment of tax deficiencies and penalties against Jackie and Lolita Robinson for tax years 2007 and 2008. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the tax court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the tax court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's January 8, 2015 decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Jackie Robinson v. Commissioner of IRS, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 2015. It affirms the tax court's decision to uphold the IRS's assessment of tax deficiencies and penalties against Jackie and Lolita Robinson for tax years 2007 and 2008. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the tax court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the tax court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's January 8, 2015 decision. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1380

    JACKIE H. ROBINSON; ESTATE OF LOLITA I. ROBINSON, Deceased,


    JACKIE H. ROBINSON, Administrator,
    Petitioners - Appellants,
    v.
    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States Tax Court.


    (Tax Ct. No. 248-11)

    Submitted:

    August 24, 2015

    Decided:

    September 3, 2015

    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jackie H. Robinson; Estate of Lolita I. Robinson, Deceased,


    Jackie H. Robinson, Administrator, Appellants Pro Se.
    Paul
    Andrew Allulis, Bruce R. Ellisen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
    JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jackie H. Robinson and the Estate of Lolita I. Robinson
    appeal

    the

    tax

    courts

    order

    sustaining

    the

    Commissioners

    assessment of deficiencies and penalties with respect to their


    2007 and 2008 federal tax liabilities.
    record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the tax court.


    Internal
    2015).
    legal
    before

    Revenue,

    Tax

    Ct.

    No.

    We have reviewed the

    248-11

    Robinson v. Commr of
    (U.S.

    Tax

    Ct.

    Jan.

    8.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like