Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Lopez, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Guadelmiro Reyes Lopez, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. Lopez, Nos. CR-99-38; CA-00-901-2 (E.D. Va. May 29, 2001).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Lopez, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Guadelmiro Reyes Lopez, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. Lopez, Nos. CR-99-38; CA-00-901-2 (E.D. Va. May 29, 2001).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-03-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7473

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Guadelmiro Reyes Lopez, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. Lopez, Nos. CR-99-38; CA-00-901-2 (E.D. Va. May 29, 2001).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Lopez, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Guadelmiro Reyes Lopez, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. Lopez, Nos. CR-99-38; CA-00-901-2 (E.D. Va. May 29, 2001).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7473

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    GUADELMIRO REYES LOPEZ, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
    (CR-99-38, CA-00-901-2)

    Submitted:

    March 21, 2002

    Decided:

    March 27, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Guadelmiro Reyes Lopez, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    James Ashford
    Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Guadelmiro Reyes Lopez, Jr. seeks to appeal the district
    courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255
    (West Supp. 2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court.

    United States v. Lopez, Nos. CR-

    99-38; CA-00-901-2 (E.D. Va. May 29, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like