Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    United States v. Bryant Kelly Pride, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Bryant Kelly Pride's motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Bryant Kelly Pride, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Bryant Kelly Pride's motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-09-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6455

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Bryant Kelly Pride's motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Bryant Kelly Pride, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Bryant Kelly Pride's motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6455

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    BRYANT KELLY PRIDE, a/k/a Bryan Kelly Pride,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
    James P. Jones, District
    Judge. (1:07-cr-00020-JPJ-1)

    Submitted:

    September 9, 2015

    Decided:

    September 11, 2015

    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Bryant Kelly Pride, Appellant Pro Se.


    Jennifer R. Bockhorst,
    Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorneys, Abingdon,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Bryant

    Kelly

    Pride

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for


    reduction of sentence.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Pride, No. 1:07-cr-

    00020-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. filed Mar. 3, 2015; entered Mar. 4, 2015).


    We

    dispense

    contentions

    with
    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like