Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Charles Gillenwater v. Dr. Robert Lucking, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Charles Gillenwater appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against Dr. Robert Lucking as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Gillenwater's appeal to be frivolous, denying his request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Charles Gillenwater v. Dr. Robert Lucking, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    1) Charles Gillenwater appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against Dr. Robert Lucking as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Gillenwater's appeal to be frivolous, denying his request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-04-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7793

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Charles Gillenwater appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against Dr. Robert Lucking as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Gillenwater's appeal to be frivolous, denying his request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Charles Gillenwater v. Dr. Robert Lucking, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Charles Gillenwater appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against Dr. Robert Lucking as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Gillenwater's appeal to be frivolous, denying his request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7793

    CHARLES GILLENWATER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DR. ROBERT LUCKING,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:13-ct-03056-BO)

    Submitted:

    April 17, 2014

    Decided:

    April 21, 2014

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles Gillenwater, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Gillenwater appeals the district courts order
    dismissing

    as

    frivolous

    under

    28

    U.S.C.

    1915

    (2012)

    his

    complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents


    of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
    reviewed

    the

    Accordingly,

    record
    we

    and

    deny

    find

    leave

    that

    to

    this

    proceed

    appeal
    in

    is

    forma

    We have
    frivolous.

    pauperis

    and

    dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
    Gillenwater v. Lucking, No. 5:13-ct-03056-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 31,
    2013).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like