Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Marvin Witherspoon v. Patricia Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Marvin Witherspoon's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision for the legal reasons stated, finding that the facts and materials before the lower court adequately presented the contentions and that oral argument was not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-02-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7230

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Marvin Witherspoon's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision for the legal reasons stated, finding that the facts and materials before the lower court adequately presented the contentions and that oral argument was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Marvin Witherspoon v. Patricia Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Marvin Witherspoon's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision for the legal reasons stated, finding that the facts and materials before the lower court adequately presented the contentions and that oral argument was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7230

    MARVIN HAROLD WITHERSPOON,


    Petitioner Appellant,
    v.
    PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:10-cv-00323-REP)

    Submitted:

    January 30, 2012

    Decided:

    February 8, 2012

    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Marvin Harold Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland


    Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Marvin
    appeals

    the

    Harold

    district

    Witherspoon,

    courts

    order

    federal

    denying

    prisoner,

    relief

    on

    U.S.C.A. 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    we

    affirm

    for

    Witherspoon
    July 29,
    facts

    legal
    before

    reasons

    Stansberry,

    2011).

    and

    materials

    v.

    the

    We

    No.

    dispense

    contentions
    the

    stated

    court

    by

    the

    oral

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    We have

    district

    argument

    court.

    (E.D.

    Va.

    because

    the

    presented

    would

    28

    Accordingly,

    3:10-cv-00323-REP

    with

    his

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like