Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Matthew O'Brien v. Mr. Summerfield, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    Matthew O'Brien filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against defendant Summerfield which was denied by the district court. O'Brien appealed to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. The 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The 4th Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its February 21, 2012 and April 5, 2012 orders denying relief on O'Brien's 1983 complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-08-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6812

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Matthew O'Brien filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against defendant Summerfield which was denied by the district court. O'Brien appealed to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. The 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The 4th Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its February 21, 2012 and April 5, 2012 orders denying relief on O'Brien's 1983 complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Matthew O'Brien v. Mr. Summerfield, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Matthew O'Brien filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against defendant Summerfield which was denied by the district court. O'Brien appealed to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. The 4th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The 4th Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its February 21, 2012 and April 5, 2012 orders denying relief on O'Brien's 1983 complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6812

    MATTHEW SPENCER OBRIEN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MR. SUMMERFIELD,
    Defendant Appellee,
    and
    DR. BROOKS; BOBBY P. SHEARIN; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER; SCOTT S.
    OAKLEY,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen Lipton Hollander, District Judge.
    (1:11-cv-02346-ELH)

    Submitted:

    August 16, 2012

    Decided:

    August 21, 2012

    Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Matthew Spencer OBrien, Appellant Pro Se.


    Daniel Christopher
    Costello, WHARTON, LEVIN, EHRMANTRAUT, KLEIN & NASH, Annapolis,
    Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Matthew Spencer OBrien appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    OBrien v. Summerfield, No. 1:11-cv-02346-ELH (D. Md.

    Feb. 21, 2012; Apr. 5, 2012).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like