Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unpublished
Unpublished
No. 12-4478
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:11-cr-00339-CCE-2)
Submitted:
Decided:
January 3, 2013
PER CURIAM:
Ketae
Jemel
Robbins
appeals
his
conviction
and
the
sentencing
issue
of
defendant
whether
to
the
188
district
months
court
based
upon
erred
by
all
the
Robbins
has
filed
pro
se
supplemental
brief
discretion
in
sentencing
him
as
career
review
discretion standard.
(2007).
that
under
and
We affirm.
deferential
abuse-of-
the
error,
sentence
offender,
district
such
as
court
committed
improperly
no
calculating
significant
the
procedural
Guidelines
range,
United States v.
If the sentence is
procedurally
reasonable,
we
then
consider
the
substantive
of
the
circumstances.
Gall,
552
U.S.
at
51.
We
United States v.
sentencing,
the
opportunity
Guidelines
to
appropriate.
argue
3553(a)
sentence
district
range
for
and
whatever
court
give
should
the
sentence
first
parties
they
an
deem
the
factors
requested
by
determine
either
whether
they
support
Id.
When
rendering
party.
the
a
sentence, the district court must make and place on the record
an individualized assessment based on the particular facts of
the case.
explaining
the
chosen
sentence,
the
sentencing
for
authority.
exercising
his
own
legal
decisionmaking
record.
2006).
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
conclude
that
(4th
Cir.
2008).
Finally,
because
the
record
does
not
not
be
raised
on
direct
appeal.
See
United
States
v.
We
therefore
affirm
the
district
courts
judgment.
petition
be
filed,
but
counsel
that
such
Counsels motion
contentions
are
adequately
4
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED