Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Nathaniel Singleton v. Mr. Nelson, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Nathaniel Singleton on his Bivens complaint against several prison food service employees. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Nathaniel Singleton v. Mr. Nelson, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Nathaniel Singleton on his Bivens complaint against several prison food service employees. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7139

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Nathaniel Singleton on his Bivens complaint against several prison food service employees. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Nathaniel Singleton v. Mr. Nelson, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Nathaniel Singleton on his Bivens complaint against several prison food service employees. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Dismissed by Supreme Court, June 29, 2015

    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7139

    NATHANIEL SINGLETON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    FOOD SERVICE OFFICER MR. NELSON; FOOD SERVICE MR. TAYLOR;
    FOOD SERVICE MR. CRAZE; FOOD SERVICE MS. JOHNSON; FOOD
    SERVICE MS. VENTON; ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE BROWN;
    ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE ARGLINE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Aiken.
    R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
    (1:12-cv-02985-RBH)

    Submitted:

    December 18, 2014

    Decided:

    December 22, 2014

    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Nathaniel Singleton, Appellant Pro Se.


    Marshall Prince, II,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Nathaniel Singleton appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
    Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Singleton v. Nelson, No. 1:12-cv-02985-RBH (D.S.C. July

    24, 2014).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like