Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ryan Lucas v. Gary Shively, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Ryan Lucas filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against Gary Shively and Patrick Lamb for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-03-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7161

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ryan Lucas filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against Gary Shively and Patrick Lamb for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Ryan Lucas v. Gary Shively, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ryan Lucas filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against Gary Shively and Patrick Lamb for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7161

    RYAN STILLMAN LUCAS,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    GARY L. SHIVELY; PATRICK LAMB,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
    Judge. (7:13-cv-00055-MFU-RSB)

    Submitted:

    February 27, 2015

    Decided:

    March 5, 2015

    Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John P. Fishwick, Jr., LICHTENSTEINFISHWICK, PLC, Roanoke,


    Virginia, for Appellant. Jeremy E. Carroll, GLENN, FELDMANN,
    DARBY & GOODLATTE, Roanoke, Virginia; Jim H. Guynn, Jr., GUYNN &
    DILLON, P.C., Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ryan

    Stillman

    Lucas

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Lucas 42


    U.S.C. 1983

    (2012)

    and

    state

    law

    claims

    false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution.


    the record and find no reversible error.

    for

    false

    arrest,

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Shively, No. 7:13-cv-00055-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. July 7, 2014).


    dispense

    with

    contentions

    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    We

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like