Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jose Larios-Alvarez v. Loretta Lynch, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    1) Jose Luis Larios-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge's denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. 2) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record, including agreed facts and evidence, and found that the record did not compel a ruling contrary to the administrative factual findings. 3) Substantial evidence supported the BIA's decision to dismiss the appeal, so the Fourth Circuit denied the petition for review.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-09-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1033

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Jose Luis Larios-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge's denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. 2) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record, including agreed facts and evidence, and found that the record did not compel a ruling contrary to the administrative factual findings. 3) Substantial evidence supported the BIA's decision to dismiss the appeal, so the Fourth Circuit denied the petition for review.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Jose Larios-Alvarez v. Loretta Lynch, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Jose Luis Larios-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge's denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. 2) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record, including agreed facts and evidence, and found that the record did not compel a ruling contrary to the administrative factual findings. 3) Substantial evidence supported the BIA's decision to dismiss the appeal, so the Fourth Circuit denied the petition for review.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1033

    JOSE LUIS LARIOS-ALVAREZ,


    Petitioner,
    v.
    LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
    Respondent.

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration


    Appeals.

    Submitted:

    August 25, 2015

    Decided:

    September 29, 2015

    Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jay S. Marks, Lauren Gold, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC,


    Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner.
    Benjamin C. Mizer,
    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan,
    Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, Office of Immigration
    Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
    D.C., for Respondent.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jose Luis Larios-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Honduras,
    petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals

    (Board)

    judges

    denial

    dismissing

    of

    his

    his

    appeal

    requests

    for

    from

    the

    asylum,

    immigration

    withholding

    of

    removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.


    We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the parties
    Joint Statement of Agreed Facts and all supporting evidence.
    conclude

    that

    the

    record

    evidence

    does

    not

    compel

    We

    ruling

    contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8


    U.S.C.

    1252(b)(4)(B)

    (2012),

    supports the Boards decision.

    and

    that

    substantial

    evidence

    See INS v. EliasZacarias, 502

    U.S. 478, 481 (1992).


    Accordingly,

    we

    deny

    reasons stated by the Board.


    19, 2014).
    legal
    before

    petition

    for

    review

    for

    the

    In re: Larios-Alvarez (B.I.A. Dec.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    this

    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like