Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    United States v. Krishna Man Joshi, 873 F.2d 1441, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 judge panel's unpublished per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The panel found the appeal to be without merit and affirmed the district court's reasoning without further explanation. The panel also declined to hold oral arguments as the dispositive issues had been recently decided by authoritative courts.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Krishna Man Joshi, 873 F.2d 1441, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views1 page
    This document is a 3 judge panel's unpublished per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The panel found the appeal to be without merit and affirmed the district court's reasoning without further explanation. The panel also declined to hold oral arguments as the dispositive issues had been recently decided by authoritative courts.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-04-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 873 F.2d 1441 Docket: 88-7086

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 judge panel's unpublished per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The panel found the appeal to be without merit and affirmed the district court's reasoning without further explanation. The panel also declined to hold oral arguments as the dispositive issues had been recently decided by authoritative courts.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views1 page

    United States v. Krishna Man Joshi, 873 F.2d 1441, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 judge panel's unpublished per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The panel found the appeal to be without merit and affirmed the district court's reasoning without further explanation. The panel also declined to hold oral arguments as the dispositive issues had been recently decided by authoritative courts.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    873 F.

    2d 1441
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Krishna Man JOSHI, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 88-7086.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Jan. 30, 1989.
    Decided April 27, 1989.

    Krishna Man Joshi, appellant pro se.


    Mark A. Berthiaume, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
    Before WIDENER, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Krishna Man Joshi appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under
    28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Joshi, C/A Nos. 87-2364-JH;
    CR-84-384-JH). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues
    recently have been decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like