Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    United States v. Jose Gonzalez, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Luis Cortes Gonzalez's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the reasons stated by the district court for denying the motion. The appellate court also denied Gonzalez's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Jose Gonzalez, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Luis Cortes Gonzalez's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the reasons stated by the district court for denying the motion. The appellate court also denied Gonzalez's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-10-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7143

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Luis Cortes Gonzalez's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the reasons stated by the district court for denying the motion. The appellate court also denied Gonzalez's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Jose Gonzalez, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Luis Cortes Gonzalez's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the reasons stated by the district court for denying the motion. The appellate court also denied Gonzalez's motion to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7143

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JOSE LUIS CORTES GONZALEZ, a/k/a Luis,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
    Glen E. Conrad, Chief
    District Judge. (5:07-cr-00063-GEC-JGW-4)

    Submitted:

    October 15, 2015

    Decided:

    October 20, 2015

    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jose Luis Cortes Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se.


    Donald Ray
    Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jose
    order

    Luis

    denying

    Cortes
    his

    Gonzalez

    motion

    for

    18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012). *


    find

    no

    reasons

    reversible
    stated

    by

    error.
    the

    appeals

    the

    reduction

    district

    of

    courts

    sentence

    under

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    district

    we

    court.

    affirm

    United

    for

    States

    the
    v.

    Gonzalez, No. 5:07-cr-00063-GEC-JGW-4 (W.D. Va. June 16, 2015).


    We deny Gonzalezs motion to appoint counsel and dispense with
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    Gonzalez confines his appeal to the district courts


    denial of relief on his request for a sentencing reduction under
    Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines.

    You might also like