Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Damian Murphy, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Damian Antonio Murphy's motion for the return of seized property. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-09-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7132

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Damian Antonio Murphy's motion for the return of seized property. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Damian Murphy, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Damian Antonio Murphy's motion for the return of seized property. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7132

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    DAMIAN ANTONIO MURPHY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
    James P. Jones, District
    Judge. (1:06-cr-00062-JPJ-1)

    Submitted:

    September 11, 2012

    Decided:

    September 14, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Damian Antonio Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Damian

    Antonio

    Murphy

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his motion for the return of seized property.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United States v. Murphy, No. 1:06-cr-00062-JPJ-1 (W.D.

    Va. June 11, 2012).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like