Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Theresa Ferguson v. Loretta Lynch, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    1) Theresa Ferguson appealed a district court order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Ferguson's case against the Attorney General and Director of the Drug Enforcement Administration. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals confined its review to the issues raised in Ferguson's informal brief. 3) Ferguson's brief did not challenge the district court's holding that summary judgment was appropriate because Ferguson did not exhaust her administrative remedies in good faith. Therefore, Ferguson forfeited appellate review of the district court's order. 4) As a result, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment granting summary judgment to Defendants.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1369

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Theresa Ferguson appealed a district court order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Ferguson's case against the Attorney General and Director of the Drug Enforcement Administration. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals confined its review to the issues raised in Ferguson's informal brief. 3) Ferguson's brief did not challenge the district court's holding that summary judgment was appropriate because Ferguson did not exhaust her administrative remedies in good faith. Therefore, Ferguson forfeited appellate review of the district court's order. 4) As a result, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment granting summary judgment to Defendants.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Theresa Ferguson v. Loretta Lynch, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Theresa Ferguson appealed a district court order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Ferguson's case against the Attorney General and Director of the Drug Enforcement Administration. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals confined its review to the issues raised in Ferguson's informal brief. 3) Ferguson's brief did not challenge the district court's holding that summary judgment was appropriate because Ferguson did not exhaust her administrative remedies in good faith. Therefore, Ferguson forfeited appellate review of the district court's order. 4) As a result, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment granting summary judgment to Defendants.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1369

    THERESA N. FERGUSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    LORETTA
    E.
    LYNCH,
    Attorney
    General,
    CHARLES
    PHILIP
    ROSENBERG, Director, Drug Enforcement Administration,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
    District Judge. (1:14-cv-01641-TSE-JFA)

    Submitted:

    October 20, 2015

    Decided:

    October 22, 2015

    Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Theresa N. Ferguson, Appellant Pro Se.


    Dennis Carl Barghaan,
    Jr., Lauren Anne Wetzler, Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Theresa

    N.

    Ferguson

    appeals

    the

    district

    granting Defendants motion for summary judgment.


    confine

    our

    brief.

    See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

    brief

    does

    review

    not

    to

    the

    challenge

    issues

    the

    raised

    in

    courts

    order

    On appeal, we

    the

    Appellants

    Because Fergusons informal

    district

    courts

    holding

    that

    summary judgment was appropriate where Ferguson did not exhaust


    her

    administrative

    remedies

    in

    good

    faith,

    forfeited appellate review of the courts order.


    we affirm the district courts judgment.

    Ferguson

    has

    Accordingly,

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like