Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    United States v. Ronald Viverette, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Ronald Kyle Viverette's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It determined the contentions and legal arguments were adequately addressed in the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Ronald Viverette, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Ronald Kyle Viverette's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It determined the contentions and legal arguments were adequately addressed in the lower court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-10-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7113

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Ronald Kyle Viverette's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It determined the contentions and legal arguments were adequately addressed in the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Ronald Viverette, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Ronald Kyle Viverette's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It determined the contentions and legal arguments were adequately addressed in the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7113

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    RONALD KYLE VIVERETTE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:11-cr-00220-BO-1)

    Submitted:

    October 20, 2015

    Decided:

    October 23, 2015

    Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronald Kyle Viverette, Appellant Pro Se.


    Shailika S. Kotiya,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronald Kyle Viverette appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    motion

    for

    sentence

    reduction

    pursuant

    to

    18

    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reasons

    reversible

    are

    argument

    adequately

    court.

    because

    presented

    in

    United

    the

    We

    contentions

    district

    for

    Viverette, No. 5:11-cr-00220-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2015).


    oral

    the

    affirm

    v.

    with

    by

    we

    States

    dispense

    stated

    error.

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like