Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Elbert Hicks v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Elbert Hicks appealed a district court's dismissal of his civil action against the U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Postal Service to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Elbert Hicks v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Elbert Hicks appealed a district court's dismissal of his civil action against the U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Postal Service to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-11-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-2072

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Elbert Hicks appealed a district court's dismissal of his civil action against the U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Postal Service to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Elbert Hicks v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Elbert Hicks appealed a district court's dismissal of his civil action against the U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Postal Service to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-2072

    ELBERT HICKS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; U.S. POSTAL SERVICE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (2:14-cv-00651-MSD-LRL)

    Submitted:

    November 19, 2015

    Decided:

    November 23, 2015

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Elbert Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.


    Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Elbert Hicks appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his civil action.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    2:14-cv-00651-MSD-LRL
    July 24, 2015).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    See Hicks v. U.S. Dept of Labor, No.

    (E.D.

    Va.

    filed

    July

    23,

    2015,

    entered

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like