Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Enzo Blanks, 4th Cir. (2015)
United States v. Enzo Blanks, 4th Cir. (2015)
United States v. Enzo Blanks, 4th Cir. (2015)
No. 15-4155
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:13-cr-00512-ELH-2)
Submitted:
Decided:
Barbara
E.
Kittay,
Rockville,
Maryland,
for
Appellant.
Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States Attorney,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM:
Enzo
Blanks
pled
guilty,
pursuant
to
written
plea
and
the
Government
negotiated
Fed.
R.
Crim.
P.
of
the
accordance
with
mandatory
Anders
v.
minimum
120-month
California,
386
sentence.
U.S.
738
In
(1967),
grounds
for
appeal
but
questioning
whether
the
se
supplemental
brief.
We
affirm
the
district
courts
judgment.
We
review
defendants
abuse-of-discretion standard.
38, 41 (2007).
sentence
under
deferential
Id. at 51.
In
court
properly
calculated
the
defendants
advisory
for
3553(a)
an
appropriate
(2012)
selected sentence.
factors,
sentence,
and
sufficiently
considered
the
18
U.S.C.
explained
the
Id. at 51.
Any
756 F.3d 295, 306 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 421
(2014).
that
sentence
the
is
unreasonable
. . . 3553(a) factors.
We
review
the
when
measured
against
the
Id.
district
courts
drug-quantity
calculation
The
district
court
heard
that
erroneous.
the
district
and
allowed
the
courts
findings
are
not
clearly
evidence
sentence
reasonable.
the
district
court
imposed
is
per
se
Cir. 2008).
In
accordance
with
Anders,
we
have
reviewed
the
entire
We
therefore
affirm
the
district
courts
judgment.
the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for
further review.
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED