Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Joseph Cuciniello v. Charles Ratledge, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joseph Cuciniello's petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the petition as stated in Cuciniello v. Ratledge, No. 5:15-hc-02008-FL (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2015). The appellate court also granted Cuciniello's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Joseph Cuciniello v. Charles Ratledge, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joseph Cuciniello's petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the petition as stated in Cuciniello v. Ratledge, No. 5:15-hc-02008-FL (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2015). The appellate court also granted Cuciniello's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-12-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7054

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joseph Cuciniello's petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the petition as stated in Cuciniello v. Ratledge, No. 5:15-hc-02008-FL (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2015). The appellate court also granted Cuciniello's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Joseph Cuciniello v. Charles Ratledge, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Joseph Cuciniello's petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the petition as stated in Cuciniello v. Ratledge, No. 5:15-hc-02008-FL (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2015). The appellate court also granted Cuciniello's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7054

    JOSEPH CUCINIELLO,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    CHARLES RATLEDGE, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (5:15-hc-02008-FL)

    Submitted:

    November 23, 2015

    Before KING and


    Circuit Judge.

    THACKER,

    Circuit

    Decided:

    Judges,

    December 14, 2015

    and

    DAVIS,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joseph Cuciniello, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Joseph Cuciniello, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts

    order

    petition.
    error.

    on

    his

    28

    U.S.C.

    2241

    (2012)

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    district

    Cuciniello v. Ratledge, No. 5:15-hc-02008-FL (E.D.N.C.

    June 22, 2015).


    facts

    relief

    Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

    pauperis,
    court.

    denying

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like