Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Alexander Jiggetts v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Alexander Jiggett's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of Maryland and Sharon Biggins. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials. The Court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Alexander Jiggetts v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Alexander Jiggett's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of Maryland and Sharon Biggins. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials. The Court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-12-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7472

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Alexander Jiggett's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of Maryland and Sharon Biggins. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials. The Court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Alexander Jiggetts v. State of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Alexander Jiggett's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the State of Maryland and Sharon Biggins. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials. The Court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7472

    ALEXANDER JIGGETTS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF MARYLAND; SHARON BIGGINS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
    Judge. (1:15-cv-02569-JFM)

    Submitted:

    December 15, 2015

    Before GREGORY
    Circuit Judge.

    and

    FLOYD,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    December 18, 2015

    and

    DAVIS,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Alexander Jiggetts, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Alexander

    Jiggetts

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Jiggetts

    v.

    Maryland,

    No.

    1:15-cv-02569-JFM

    filed Sept. 10, 2015 & entered Sept. 11, 2015).

    (D.

    Md.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like