United States v. Stephen Gills, 4th Cir. (2015)

You might also like

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7539

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
STEPHEN D. GILLS,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:14-cr-00160-HCM-DEM-1)

Submitted:

December 17, 2015

Decided:

December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen D. Gills, Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Elaine OBoyle,


Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Norfolk,
Virginia,
for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:
Stephen Gills appeals the district courts order denying
his motion to modify his schedule of restitution payments.
a

defendant

is

ordered

to

pay

restitution,

and

When

material

change in the defendants economic circumstances [] might affect


the

defendants

court

is

ability

authorized

to

to

pay

restitution,

adjust

interests of justice require.

the

payment

the

sentencing

schedule

as

United States v. Grant, 715 F.3d

552, 554 (4th Cir. 2013) (quoting 18 U.S.C. 3664(k)).


the

district

court

found

the

that

Gills

had

alleged

no

Here,

material

changes.

We have reviewed the record and found no reversible

error

the

in

restitution

district
schedule.

courts

order

See

United

declining
States

to
v.

modify

its

Gills,

No.

Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Gills motion.

We

2:14-cr-00160-HCM-DEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2015).

dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

You might also like