Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Luis Hernandez-Espinoza, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Luis Hernandez-Espinoza's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. As Hernandez-Espinoza's sentence was determined under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1(b) (2009), he was not eligible for a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7198

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Luis Hernandez-Espinoza's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. As Hernandez-Espinoza's sentence was determined under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1(b) (2009), he was not eligible for a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    18 views2 pages

    United States v. Luis Hernandez-Espinoza, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Luis Hernandez-Espinoza's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. As Hernandez-Espinoza's sentence was determined under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1(b) (2009), he was not eligible for a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7198

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LUIS HERNANDEZ-ESPINOZA, a/k/a Raphael Lopez, a/k/a Rafael
    Lopez,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III,
    Chief District Judge. (7:09-cr-00112-D-1)

    Submitted:

    December 17, 2015

    Decided:

    December 22, 2015

    Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Luis Hernandez-Espinoza, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Severo, OFFICE


    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Luis Hernandez-Espinoza appeals from the district court order
    denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a
    sentence reduction.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible

    See

    error.

    4B1.1(b) (2009).

    U.S.

    Sentencing

    Accordingly, we affirm.

    Guidelines

    Manual

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like