Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stanley Corbett, Jr. v. G. J. Branker, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    23 views3 pages
    The document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Stanley Earl Corbett Jr. in a civil rights case. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the district court's order granting summary judgment to the defendants was not a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. The court therefore lacked jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-01-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7486

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Stanley Earl Corbett Jr. in a civil rights case. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the district court's order granting summary judgment to the defendants was not a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. The court therefore lacked jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    23 views3 pages

    Stanley Corbett, Jr. v. G. J. Branker, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Stanley Earl Corbett Jr. in a civil rights case. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the district court's order granting summary judgment to the defendants was not a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. The court therefore lacked jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7486

    STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    CHARDAN WHITEHEAD; TIJUAN WILSON; SAMUEL MCCRAE; BILLY JOE
    RIDDLE; JOHN DAVIS; HASEEM EVERETT; JEROME PETERS,
    Plaintiffs,
    v.
    G. J. BRANKER; SERGEANT PRADO; OFFICER LANCASTER; OFFICER
    HOLLOMAN; OFFICER HICKS; OFFICER JAMES; KENNETH LASSITER;
    MICHAEL NORRIS; BRENT SOUCIER; ARTHUR MARSH; OFFICER OATES;
    OFFICER BIDWELL; MARCEL COLLEYMORE; OFFICER TYSON; OFFICER
    ALEXANDER,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    SERGEANT REED; OFFICER MOORE; OFFICER PRESS;
    SUMMERLIN; OFFICER LASSITER; JARED WELCH; BEN
    OFFICER HUNT,

    OFFICER
    MORGAN;

    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:13-ct-03201-BO)

    Submitted:

    January 5, 2016

    Decided:

    January 7, 2016

    Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Judith Maria
    Estevez, Assistant Attorney General, Donna Elizabeth Tanner,
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
    courts

    order

    granting

    the

    Defendants

    motion

    for

    summary

    judgment as to Corbetts claims in a civil rights action brought


    pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012).

    This court may exercise

    jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2012),


    and

    certain

    interlocutory

    and

    collateral

    orders,

    28

    U.S.C.

    1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.


    Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

    The order Corbett

    seeks

    nor

    to

    appeal

    is

    neither

    final

    interlocutory or collateral order.


    appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    order

    an

    appealable

    Accordingly, we dismiss the

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like