Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Woods, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed two district court orders relating to post-judgment motions filed by Isaac Lee Woods and Regina Bailey Woods. The district court found no error in the United States' decision not to commence a separate civil action to enforce a judgment of restitution against the Woods and found no evidence of an improper criminal investigation instead of a legitimate attempt to collect on the restitution judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-05-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-8004

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed two district court orders relating to post-judgment motions filed by Isaac Lee Woods and Regina Bailey Woods. The district court found no error in the United States' decision not to commence a separate civil action to enforce a judgment of restitution against the Woods and found no evidence of an improper criminal investigation instead of a legitimate attempt to collect on the restitution judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views3 pages

    United States v. Woods, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed two district court orders relating to post-judgment motions filed by Isaac Lee Woods and Regina Bailey Woods. The district court found no error in the United States' decision not to commence a separate civil action to enforce a judgment of restitution against the Woods and found no evidence of an improper criminal investigation instead of a legitimate attempt to collect on the restitution judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8004

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ISAAC LEE WOODS; REGINA BAILEY WOODS,
    Defendants - Appellants.

    No. 10-6039

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ISAAC LEE WOODS; REGINA BAILEY WOODS,
    Defendants - Appellants.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    Chief District Judge. (5:05-cr-00131-FL-1)

    Submitted:

    April 8, 2010

    Decided:

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    May 7, 2010

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Isaac Lee Woods, Regina Bailey Woods, Appellants Pro Se.


    S.
    Katherine Burnette, Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States
    Attorneys, Clay Campbell Wheeler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    In
    Regina

    these

    Bailey

    consolidated

    Woods

    appeals,

    challenge

    two

    Isaac

    Lee

    district

    Woods

    court

    and

    orders

    disposing of several of their post-judgment motions and their


    objections

    to

    the

    United

    judgment of restitution.

    States

    attempt

    to

    collect

    on

    the

    We affirm.

    We find no error in the United States decision not to


    commence

    separate

    civil

    judgment of restitution.

    action

    in

    order

    to

    enforce

    the

    We further note there was no clear

    error by the district court finding that there was nothing to


    suggest an improper criminal investigation by the United States
    instead of a legitimate attempt to collect on the judgment of
    restitution.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    reasoning of the district court.

    record

    and

    affirm

    on

    the

    See United States v. Woods,

    No. 5:05-cr-00131-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 2009; Dec. 28, 2009).


    We also deny the Woods motion for a copy of a transcript of the
    October 8, 2009 hearing prepared at the Governments expense and
    their

    motion

    to

    expedite.

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like