Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Eyvonne Artis v. U.S. Foods Service, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case between Eyvonne Artis and U.S. Foods Service. The U.S. District Court for Maryland granted summary judgment to U.S. Foods on Artis' claims of discrimination under Title VII. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the case and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied Artis' request to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-02-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1477

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case between Eyvonne Artis and U.S. Foods Service. The U.S. District Court for Maryland granted summary judgment to U.S. Foods on Artis' claims of discrimination under Title VII. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the case and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied Artis' request to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Eyvonne Artis v. U.S. Foods Service, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case between Eyvonne Artis and U.S. Foods Service. The U.S. District Court for Maryland granted summary judgment to U.S. Foods on Artis' claims of discrimination under Title VII. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the case and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied Artis' request to appoint counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1477

    EYVONNE ARTIS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    U.S. FOODS SERVICE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    James K. Bredar, District Judge.
    (1:13-cv-02870-JKB)

    Submitted:

    November 30, 2015

    Decided:

    February 9, 2016

    Before GREGORY, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eyvonne Artis, Appellant Pro Se.


    Christine Mary Costantino,
    Karla Grossenbacher, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eyvonne Artis appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment to U.S. Foods Service on her claims under Title
    VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e to
    2000e-17.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Artis v. U.S. Foods Serv., No. 1:13-cv-02870-

    JKB (D. Md. Apr. 3, 2015).

    We deny Artis motion to appoint

    counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before this court, and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like