Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ronald Buford v. Ammar's Inc., 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Ronald Buford filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against Ammar's Inc. which was granted summary judgment by the district court. Buford appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for Ammar's Inc. as Buford's employment discrimination claims lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1228

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronald Buford filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against Ammar's Inc. which was granted summary judgment by the district court. Buford appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for Ammar's Inc. as Buford's employment discrimination claims lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Ronald Buford v. Ammar's Inc., 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronald Buford filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against Ammar's Inc. which was granted summary judgment by the district court. Buford appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's decision to grant summary judgment for Ammar's Inc. as Buford's employment discrimination claims lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1228

    RONALD G. BUFORD,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    AMMARS INC.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
    James P. Jones, District
    Judge. (1:14-cv-00012-JPJ-PMS)

    Submitted:

    February 23, 2016

    Decided:

    February 25, 2016

    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronald G. Buford, Appellant Pro Se. Meredith Renee Fleming


    Bergeson, Michael Nicholas Petkovich, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronald

    G.

    Buford

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    granting the Defendants motion for summary judgment in Bufords


    employment discrimination action.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Buford v. Ammars, Inc.,

    No. 1:14-cv-00012-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2015).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like