Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Robert Cooper v. Brad Brinegar, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Robert Cooper's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court can only hear appeals of final orders or certain interlocutory orders, but the order Cooper sought to appeal - which granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion for summary judgment - was neither final nor appealable. As such, the court dismissed the appeal without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-03-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7573

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Robert Cooper's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court can only hear appeals of final orders or certain interlocutory orders, but the order Cooper sought to appeal - which granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion for summary judgment - was neither final nor appealable. As such, the court dismissed the appeal without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views3 pages

    Robert Cooper v. Brad Brinegar, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Robert Cooper's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court can only hear appeals of final orders or certain interlocutory orders, but the order Cooper sought to appeal - which granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion for summary judgment - was neither final nor appealable. As such, the court dismissed the appeal without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7573

    ROBERT COOPER,
    Plaintiff - appellant,
    v.
    BRAD BRINEGAR; C. or F. DAVIS, B. PAYTON; CPL. LOGSDON; CPL.
    WILBURN; CPL. BARB; CPL. HENDRICKS; CHIEF MICHAEL P. THOMAS;
    CPL. S. A. WILSON; CPL. R. CONNER; CPL. J. FONTAIN; CPL. HETZ;
    CPL. M. DAVIS; OFFICER HENDRICKS; S. DILLEY; RONALD SHANE
    WEBER; FRANK BISHOP, JR.,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    SECRETARY GREGG HERSHBERGER; SERGEANT CRUMPAC,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge.
    (1:13-cv-03692-JFM)

    Submitted:

    February 25, 2016

    Decided:

    March 1, 2016

    Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Cooper, Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
    Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Cooper seeks to appeal the district courts order
    granting in part and denying in part Defendants motion for summary
    judgment.

    This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

    orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and


    collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
    Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
    The order Cooper seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Accordingly, we
    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like