Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Robert Graves, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Robert James Graves's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its August 31, 2015 opinion. The appellate court also granted Graves's request to proceed in forma pauperis but determined oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-03-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7455

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Robert James Graves's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its August 31, 2015 opinion. The appellate court also granted Graves's request to proceed in forma pauperis but determined oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Robert Graves, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of Robert James Graves's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its August 31, 2015 opinion. The appellate court also granted Graves's request to proceed in forma pauperis but determined oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7455

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    ROBERT JAMES GRAVES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Danville.
    Norman K. Moon, Senior
    District Judge. (4:99-cr-70049-NKM-RSB-1)

    Submitted:

    February 26, 2016

    Before GREGORY
    Circuit Judge.

    and

    FLOYD,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    March 16, 2016

    DAVIS,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert James Graves, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,


    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Roanoke,
    Virginia,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert
    denying

    his

    James
    18

    Graves

    U.S.C.

    appeals

    the

    3582(c)(2)

    district

    (2012)

    courts

    motion.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    order

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm


    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Graves, No. 4:99-cr-70049-NKM-RSB-1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 31, 2015).


    We

    dispense

    contentions

    with
    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like