Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • James Lomax v. Colin Ottey, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to defendants in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case filed by James Meshach Lomax against prison medical staff and administrators. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for granting summary judgment to defendants and denying Lomax's motion for reconsideration. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in written submissions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-03-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7597

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to defendants in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case filed by James Meshach Lomax against prison medical staff and administrators. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for granting summary judgment to defendants and denying Lomax's motion for reconsideration. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in written submissions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    James Lomax v. Colin Ottey, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to defendants in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case filed by James Meshach Lomax against prison medical staff and administrators. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for granting summary judgment to defendants and denying Lomax's motion for reconsideration. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in written submissions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7597

    JAMES MESHACH LOMAX,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    COLIN OTTEY, M.D.; GREG FLURY, P.A.; FRANK BISHOP, Warden;
    BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Former Warden; R. RODERICK, Case
    Management Manager,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
    Judge. (8:14-cv-02180-DKC)

    Submitted:

    March 14, 2016

    Decided:

    March 16, 2016

    Before MOTZ, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Meshach Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Serra Aygun, Carolyn


    Israel Stein, BONNER, KIERNAN, TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP,
    Washington,
    D.C.;
    Elizabeth
    Erin
    Pavlick,
    UNITED
    STATES
    DEPARTMENT
    OF
    DEFENSE,
    Washington,
    D.C.;
    Nichole
    Cherie
    Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
    Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    James

    Meshach

    Lomax

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders

    granting summary judgment to defendants in this action filed


    under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012), and denying reconsideration.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Lomax v. Ottey, No. 8:14-cv-02180-DKC (D. Md. filed Aug.

    4, 2015 & entered Aug. 5, 2015; Sept. 24, 2015).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like