Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jermaine Jones, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jermaine Jones's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Jones's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-03-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 16-6036

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jermaine Jones's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Jones's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Jermaine Jones, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jermaine Jones's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Jones's motion to reduce his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 16-6036

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JERMAINE JONES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Greenville.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (4:13-cr-00083-BO-1)

    Submitted:

    March 17, 2016

    Decided:

    March 22, 2016

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jermaine Jones, Appellant Pro Se. S. Katherine Burnette, OFFICE


    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jermaine Jones appeals the district courts order denying
    his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Jones, No. 4:13-cr-00083-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 22, 2015 &


    entered Dec. 23, 2015).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like