Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Eric Taylor v. Virginia, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    28 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss Eric Emanuel Taylor's complaint without prejudice and impose an expanded system of prefiling review on his future filings. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The district court's reasons for its decision were upheld. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-03-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-2350

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss Eric Emanuel Taylor's complaint without prejudice and impose an expanded system of prefiling review on his future filings. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The district court's reasons for its decision were upheld. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    28 views2 pages

    Eric Taylor v. Virginia, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss Eric Emanuel Taylor's complaint without prejudice and impose an expanded system of prefiling review on his future filings. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The district court's reasons for its decision were upheld. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Dismissed by Supreme Court, May 31, 2016

    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-2350

    ERIC EMANUEL TAYLOR,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    VIRGINIA; THE UNITED STATES,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Arenda L. Wright Allen,
    District Judge. (2:15-cv-00429-AWA-RJK)

    Submitted:

    March 16, 2016

    Before KING and


    Circuit Judge.

    SHEDD,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    March 22, 2016

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eric Emanuel Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eric
    dismissing

    Emanuel
    his

    Taylor

    appeals

    complaint

    without

    the

    district

    prejudice

    and

    courts

    order

    imposing

    expanded system of prefiling review on his future filings.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    an
    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Taylor v. Virginia, No. 2:15-cv-00429-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va.

    Oct. 27, 2015).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like