Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Tyrone Roberson v. Anthony Padula, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Tyrone Lamar Roberson on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Additionally, the Court of Appeals declined to address any claims raised for the first time on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Tyrone Roberson v. Anthony Padula, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Tyrone Lamar Roberson on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Additionally, the Court of Appeals declined to address any claims raised for the first time on appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-03-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7329

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Tyrone Lamar Roberson on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Additionally, the Court of Appeals declined to address any claims raised for the first time on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views3 pages

    Tyrone Roberson v. Anthony Padula, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Tyrone Lamar Roberson on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Additionally, the Court of Appeals declined to address any claims raised for the first time on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7329

    TYRONE LAMAR ROBERSON,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden Lee Corrections Institution;
    LIEUTENANT A. DAVIS; MS. FULTON, Medical Health Care
    Provider RN; RN MS. JUDY RABON; RN MS. MCDONALD; J. MCREE,
    MD, KCI Pharmacy; JUANITA MOSS, Food Service Supervisor;
    MS. BELL, Food Service Supervisor; MS. NORMAN, Food Service
    Supervisor; MS. ANDERSON, Food Service Supervisor,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MAJOR JAMES DEAN;
    LIEUTENANT ERNEST MIMS; SERGEANT B. COOK; SERGEANT K.
    ARENS; MS. KELA E. THOMAS, Commission of Probation Parole
    and Pardon Services Director; WILLIAM BYARS, JR., SCDC
    Director, et al; SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BUDGET AND CONTROL
    BOARD COMMITTEE; WILLIAM F. MARSCHER, III, SC Commission on
    Indigent Defense; FREDERICK M. CORLEY, Esquire; RANDOLPH
    MURDAUGH, III, Solicitor Attorney for the State; WILLIAM T.
    HOWELL, Judge of the 14th Judicial Circuit Court of SC,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.
    Richard Mark Gergel, District
    Judge. (2:13-cv-01872-RMG)

    Submitted:

    March 29, 2016

    Decided:

    March 31, 2016

    Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Tyrone Lamar Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parker McLean,


    CLARKE, JOHNSON, PETERSON & MCLEAN, PA, Florence, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Tyrone Lamar Roberson appeals the district courts order
    adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge
    and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.
    July 22,

    Roberson
    2015).

    v.
    In

    Padula,

    No.

    addition,

    we

    raised for the first time on appeal.


    1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).

    2:13-cv-01872-RMG
    decline

    to

    (D.S.C.

    address

    claims

    See Muth v. United States,

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like