Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Douglas Morris, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Douglas Edward Morris appealed the district court's denial of a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's judgment, denied Morris' motion for appointment of counsel, and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Morris' request for a sentence reduction.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-04-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7984

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Douglas Edward Morris appealed the district court's denial of a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's judgment, denied Morris' motion for appointment of counsel, and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Morris' request for a sentence reduction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Douglas Morris, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Douglas Edward Morris appealed the district court's denial of a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's judgment, denied Morris' motion for appointment of counsel, and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Morris' request for a sentence reduction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7984

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    DOUGLAS EDWARD MORRIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District
    Judge. (5:14-cr-00103-1)

    Submitted:

    March 29, 2016

    Decided:

    April 1, 2016

    Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Douglas Edward Morris, Appellant Pro Se.


    John Lanier File,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Douglas Edward Morris appeals the district courts order
    denying a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012).
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we deny Morris motions for appointment of counsel


    and affirm the district courts judgment. United States v. Morris,
    No. 5:14-cr-00103-1 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 11, 2015).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like