Professional Documents
Culture Documents
912 F.2d 463 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 168
912 F.2d 463 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 168
912 F.2d 463 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 168
2d 463
30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 168
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of
unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
ALEXANDRIA COMMITTEE OF POLICE, IUPA, LOCAL
5, AFL-CIO,
Kathleen Davis West, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and
Michael J. Clancey, Lennis E. George, Ronald G. Geovannucci,
Donald C. Green, Morton M. Ford, III, Gwendolyn A. Robbins,
Paul A. Sheehan, Ralph R. Stanley, Albert G. Tierney,
Linwood Martin West, Jr., Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, Defendant-Appellee.
ALEXANDRIA COMMITTEE OF POLICE, IUPA, LOCAL
5, AFL-CIO,
Michael J. Clancey, Lennis E. George, Ronald G. Geovannucci,
Donald C. Green, Morton M. Ford, III, Gwendolyn A. Robbins,
Paul A. Sheehan, Ralph R. Stanley, Albert G. Tierney,
Kathleen Davis West, Linwood Martin West, Jr., PlaintiffsAppellees,
v.
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, Defendant-Appellant.
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS
ALEXANDRIA LOCAL
2141, AFL-CIO, Alexandria Fire Department Personnel
Association, George H. Creed, Captain (Ret.), Leonard M.
Devers, Captain, Frederick M. Gaddy, Captain, William E.
George, Captain, Thomas A. Harrell, Jr., Captain, Barry N.
Holland, Captain, Terrence E. Kisner, Captain, Duane
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-89-9-A;
CA-89-161-A)
Michael Tarcissius Leibig, Zwerdling, Paul, Leibig, Kahn, Thompson &
Driesen, P.C., Washington, D.C., (argued), for appellants; Joseph E.
Slater, Zwerdling, Paul, Leibig, Kahn, Thompson & Driesen, P.C.,
We have reviewed the briefs of counsel, heard oral argument, and satisfied
ourselves concerning the facts of the case and applicable law. We find no
reversible error in the district court's judgment. The district court properly
applied a "window of correction" to allow retroactive application of the
exemption provision to the exempt officials, and properly found that the
primary duty of the non-exempt officials was not management as defined by the
labor regulations. We therefore affirm on the opinion of the district court.
3AFFIRMED.