Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Therl Taylor v. Catherine Amason, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Therl Taylor filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina Department of Corrections officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on Taylor's complaint. The district court also denied Taylor's Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment and found his discovery motion was moot. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the record.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Therl Taylor v. Catherine Amason, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views3 pages
    Therl Taylor filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina Department of Corrections officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on Taylor's complaint. The district court also denied Taylor's Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment and found his discovery motion was moot. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the record.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-04-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7807

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Therl Taylor filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina Department of Corrections officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on Taylor's complaint. The district court also denied Taylor's Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment and found his discovery motion was moot. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the record.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views3 pages

    Therl Taylor v. Catherine Amason, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Therl Taylor filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina Department of Corrections officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on Taylor's complaint. The district court also denied Taylor's Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment and found his discovery motion was moot. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the record.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7807

    THERL TAYLOR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CATHERINE AMASON, SCDC Mailroom Supervisor; MISHA MICHELLE,
    Mailroom Attendant; WAYNE THOMPSON, SCDC Lieutenant; A.
    SELLARS, SCDC Disciplinary Hearing Officer; D. SEWARD, SCDC
    Major; JEANNE MCKAY, SCDC Associate Warden; JANE DOES,
    Employee; JANE CHISUM, CO; JOHN EVRY, CO; CHRIS FLORIAN,
    SCDC Office of General Counsel Attorney; WILLIAM BYERS, SCDC
    Director,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    JON DOES, Inmate; SCDC,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.
    Richard Mark Gergel, District
    Judge. (2:13-cv-03449-RMG)

    Submitted:

    April 21, 2016

    Decided:

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    April 25, 2016

    Therl Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.


    Roy F. Laney, Thomas Lowndes
    Pope, Jayme Leigh Shy, Damon C. Wlodarczyk, RILEY, POPE & LANEY,
    LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Therl Taylor appeals the district courts order accepting
    the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint, its order denying his
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, and the magistrate judges order
    denying as moot his discovery motion.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Taylor v. Amason, No.

    2:13-cv-03449-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2015; Oct. 14, 2015; Nov.


    18, 2014).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like