Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    Habeeb Malik v. Beverly Woods, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Habeeb Abdul Malik filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several South Carolina Department of Corrections officials and medical staff, alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit also denied Malik's pending motion and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Habeeb Malik v. Beverly Woods, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    Habeeb Abdul Malik filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several South Carolina Department of Corrections officials and medical staff, alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit also denied Malik's pending motion and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-04-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7880

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Habeeb Abdul Malik filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several South Carolina Department of Corrections officials and medical staff, alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit also denied Malik's pending motion and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    Habeeb Malik v. Beverly Woods, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Habeeb Abdul Malik filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several South Carolina Department of Corrections officials and medical staff, alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit also denied Malik's pending motion and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7880

    HABEEB ABDUL MALIK, a/k/a Ron Tearia Nicholas,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    BEVERLY A. WOODS, Psychiatrist; sued in their personal and
    official capacity; BRIAN STIRLING, SCDC Director; sued in
    their personal and official capacity; BERNARD MCKIE, SCDC
    Warden; sued in their personal and official capacity; ROBERT
    WARD, Deputy Director; sued in their personal official
    capacity; JANICE PHILLIPS, Health Care Authority; sued in
    their personal and official capacity,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
    R. Bryan Harwell, District
    Judge. (5:14-cv-03473-RBH)

    Submitted:

    April 20, 2016

    Decided:

    April 27, 2016

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Habeeb Abdul Malik, Appellant Pro Se.


    Andrew Lindemann,
    DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Habeeb

    Abdul

    Malik

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2012)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we deny the pending motion and affirm for the reasons stated by
    the district court.

    See Malik v. Woods, No. 5:14-cv-03473-RBH

    (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 2015).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like