Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Eugene Atkins, II v. Terry O'Brien, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Eugene Atkins' 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. While granting Atkins' motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-05-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-7948

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Eugene Atkins' 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. While granting Atkins' motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Eugene Atkins, II v. Terry O'Brien, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Eugene Atkins' 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. While granting Atkins' motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-7948

    EUGENE ATKINS, II,


    Petitioner Appellant,
    v.
    TERRY OBRIEN, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Elkins.
    John Preston Bailey,
    District Judge. (2:14-cv-00036-JPB-JES)

    Submitted:

    April 27, 2016

    Decided:

    May 2, 2016

    Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eugene Atkins, II, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eugene Atkins, II, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts

    order

    petition.
    error.
    in

    denying

    relief

    on

    his

    28

    U.S.C.

    2241

    (2012)

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, although we grant Atkins motion to proceed

    forma

    pauperis,

    district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    Atkins v. OBrien, No. 2:14-cv-00036-JPB-JES

    (N.D. W. Va. Nov. 30, 2015).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like