Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unpublished
Unpublished
No. 15-4542
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:14-cr-00098-IMK-JSK-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Robert
Crenshaw
appeals
his
conviction
and
the
sentence
of
protected
location,
in
violation
of
21
U.S.C.
he
has
questioning
found
whether
no
meritorious
Crenshaws
grounds
plea
was
for
appeal
voluntary,
but
whether
v.
Massenburg,
(providing
Crenshaw
standard).
misapprehended
564
F.3d
337,
Although
the
343
counsel
terms
of
his
(4th
See United
Cir.
questions
plea
2009)
whether
agreement,
See
Walton v. Angelone, 321 F.3d 442, 462 (4th Cir. 2003) (Absent
clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, [a defendant] is
bound
by
colloquy.).
the
representations
he
made
during
the
plea
review
substantive
standard.
Crenshaws
reasonableness,
Gall
v.
United
sentence
applying
States,
for
an
552
procedural
and
abuse-of-discretion
U.S.
38,
51
(2007).
Id.
sentence
is
substantively
reasonable.
United
States v. Louthian, 756 F.3d 295, 306 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,
135 S. Ct. 421 (2014).
Id.
Having reviewed
v.
Benton,
523
F.3d
424,
435
(4th
United
Cir.
2008)
appeal
. . .
unless
it
conclusively
3
appears
from
the
record
that
defense
counsel
did
not
provide
effective
accordance
with
Anders,
we
have
reviewed
the
entire
record for any meritorious grounds for appeal and have found
none.
sentence.
writing,
Accordingly,
we
affirm
Crenshaws
conviction
and
his
right
to
petition
the
Supreme
Court
of
the